Robert Sudy is a seasoned researcher of pseudolaw theory, having been involved with the movement on social media in Australia for more than a decade. The mythology behind most pseudlaw concepts is extremely peculiar, and understanding the concepts requires journey into the conspiratorial and demon-haunted mystical shadow world of the online community.
Robert’s personal journey into the “Freeman Delusion” begins with himself being firmly convinced of several pseudolaw “common law” arguments, passing on the information to others online for several years, and applying the strategies in driving and several other matters. After New South Wales Magistrate David Heilpern patiently took the time to comprehensively reject all the arguments contended in his final judgment, Robert’s search for a hint of legal merit in the theories gathered momentum.
Armed with a thorough understanding of the concepts theorised, he took the “devil’s advocate” approach through 9 years of online debates with some of the most prominent leaders in the movement, both in Australia and overseas. He concurrently researched how the individual arguments were rejected previously in the higher courts, and dividing legal fact from pseudolaw fiction, slowly debunked the fundamentals one by one. The conclusions reached in his journey are compiled in this comprehensive analysis of hundreds of separate and yet connected pseudolaw theories, citing thousands of references, from cases in the federal and higher state courts in Australia and overseas, the associated domestic provisions in legislation, and other reputable legal sources around the world.
While concepts like the “strawman” have been referred to by the courts as “Litigation Poison”, this analysis is ultimately a call to reason for all involved in perpetuating these internet myths, that ultimately can only cause harm and loss to those gullible enough to act upon the information. If people attempt to apply these legally unintelligible pseudolaw concepts in serious matters before the courts, this damage can unfortunately include incarceration, broken families, severe financial hardship, psychiatric detention, and loss of homes.
When stripped bare of any alleged association or applicability to law, the pseudolaw doctrine stands naked as the political movement it really is. Although it contains anarchist elements, the ideals expressed are purely political, not legal, and ultimately, the law courts are not the venue for political change.
The encyclopedia Freeman Delusion: The Organised Pseudolegal Commercial Argument in Australia has now become more of a database specifically for legal scholars and academics researching the pseudolaw phenomenon for the purposes of publishing further literature. If you are with a university and would like to access the content for these reasons, please send me an email at robertsudy@freemandelusion.com to discuss.
Although it has assisted the general public over the last 5 years, I am concerned it has grown so considerably into an enormous body of work which may be difficult for the layman to understand and navigate, with over 600 individual articles, over 3000 judgements, publications and academic text in pdf format, as well as video and audio files.
Therefore access has been limited to ANNUAL MEMBERSHIPS.
Click here to view the complete members only ENCYCLOPEDIA INDEX
Alternatively, I am publishing a range of various texts taking in subject matter individually, complete with links to documents available on the website data base.
LATEST DOCUMENTS
(1) Australian Pseudolaw Argumentation
A 10-page draft version of a new text, titled Australian Pseudolaw Argumentation, was released in January 2023, which is a brief overview, as opposed to explaining the nuances of the 100 most commonly used individual pseudolaw motifs, which are characterised and grouped into a larger indicia or species of pseudo legal thought, with nearly 100 hyperlinks to pdf documents addressing individual pseudolaw motifs. The document also serves as a handy index to the many reference materials.
(2) The Strawman Duality
I have nearly completed the final text of a 65-page document focusing solely on the pseudolaw concept of The Strawman Duality, the belief that a “legal person” is somehow distinct from a physical human being, created by the government through birth registration and then linked to the physical person as a kind of parasitic twin or doppelganger, providing the mechanism by which state actors exert their otherwise illegitimate legislated authority over the physical “man”. This document is complete with plentiful reference links and explanatory footnotes including pdf files compiled on the website. Meet your Strawman, The Evil Conspiracy to Capitalise Lettering, A Corporation can be a Person, but a Person cannot be a Corporation, I’m not a citizen and I’m not a person!, Lost at Sea – The Cestui Que Vie Act 1666, It’s illegal to use a legal name- Kate of Gaia, Penhallow v Doane’s Administrators and Cruden v Neale (US cases), God is no respecter of persons, Glossa? The Romley Stewart Deception by Justinian, Strawman in the Courts.
(3) Pseudolaw Vexatious Litigants
This very thorough document contains a case by case analysis, along with pdf’s files of each decision, forming the complete litigation history of prominent pseudolaw-influenced vexatious litigant “founding fathers” such as Alan Skyring, Patrick Cusack, Peter Gargan, Wolter Joosse, David Fitzgibbon, John Wilson, Richard Gunter, Brian Shaw, Donald Cameron, David Walter, Wayne Glew, Leonard Clampett, John Walsh, etc, through to the recent declaration of Ross Bradley as a vexatious litigant.
More individuals documents will be added here.
Vaxatious Litigant and Australian Emergency Law
You must be logged in to post a comment.