Robert Sudy is a seasoned researcher of pseudo legal theory, having been involved with the movement on social media in Australia for more than a decade. The mythology behind most pseudo legal concepts is extremely peculiar, and understanding the concepts requires journey into the conspiratorial and demon-haunted mystical shadow world of the online community.

Robert’s personal journey into “The Freeman Delusion” begins with himself being firmly convinced of the “commercial argument”, passing on the information to others online for several years, and applying the strategies in driving and several other matters.

After New South Wales Magistrate David Heilpern patiently took the time to comprehensively reject all the arguments contended in his final judgment, Robert’s search for a hint of legal merit in the theories gathered momentum.

Armed with a thorough understanding of the concepts theorised, he took the “devil’s advocate” approach through 9 years of online debates with some of the most prominent leaders in the movement, both in Australia and overseas. He concurrently researched how the individual arguments were rejected previously in the higher courts, and dividing legal fact from pseudo legal fiction, slowly debunked the fundamentals one by one.

The conclusions reached in his journey are compiled in this comprehensive analysis of hundreds of separate and yet connected pseudo legal theories, citing thousands of references, from cases in the federal and higher state courts in Australia and overseas, the associated domestic provisions in legislation, and other reputable legal sources around the world.

While concepts like the “strawman” have been referred to by the courts as “Litigation Poison”, this analysis is ultimately a call to reason for all involved in perpetuating these internet myths, that ultimately can only cause harm and loss to those gullible enough to act upon the information. If people attempt to apply these legally unintelligible OPCA concepts in serious matters before the courts, this damage can unfortunately include incarceration, broken families, severe financial hardship, psychiatric detention, and loss of homes.

When stripped bare of any alleged association or applicability to law, the OPCA doctrine stands naked as the *political movement* it really is. Although it contains anarchist elements, the ideals expressed are purely POLITICAL, not LEGAL, and ultimately, the law courts are not the venue for political change.


The encyclopedia Freeman Delusion: The Organised Pseudolegal Commercial Argument in Australia, is now only available as a database specifically for legal scholars and academics researching the pseudolaw phenomenon for the purposes of publishing further literature. If you are with a university and would like to access the content for these reasons, please send me an email at robertsudy@freemandelusion.com to discuss.

Although it has assisted the general public over the last 5 years, I am concerned it has grown so considerably into an enormous body of work which may be difficult for the layman to understand and navigate, with over 600 individual articles, over 3000 judgements, publications and academic text in pdf format, as well as video and audio files, and therefore membership has been limited.

Click here to members only ENCYCLOPEDIA INDEX

Alternatively, I am publishing a range of various texts taking in subject matter individually, complete with links to documents available on the website data base.


(1) Australian Pseudolaw Argumentation


In January 2023 I released a free 10-page draft version of a new text, titled Australian Pseudolaw Argumentation, which is a brief overview, as opposed to explaining the nuances of the 100 most commonly used individual pseudolaw motifs. I have characterised and grouped these into a larger indicia or species of pseudo legal thought, consistent with the format of the six core concepts found in the pseudolaw memeplex, as observed by Dr Donald Netolitzky KC.

Feel free to download the following draft document:

I have nearly completed the final edition of this now extended text, which in effect, takes into explanatory footnotes all of the referenced material in each of the subject matter articles linked to in the 10-page draft edition, converting it into a 80-page stand-alone document, complete with around 1000 reference links. Just like the draft edition, embedded hyperlinks are not to webpages, but solely to permanent pdf files in the huge library of case law and academic literature compiled on the website.

Sample:


(2) The Strawman Duality


I have nearly completed the final text of a 65-page document focusing solely on the pseudolaw concept of The Strawman Duality, the belief that a “legal person” is somehow distinct from a physical human being, created by the government through birth registration and then linked to the physical person as a kind of parasitic twin or doppelganger, providing the mechanism by which state actors exert their otherwise illegitimate legislated authority over the physical “man”. This document is complete with plentiful reference links and explanatory footnotes including pdf files compiled on the website. Meet Your Strawman – Capitalised Lettering – Natural Person v Corporation – Lost at Sea – Lose the Name – Penhallow and Cruden v Neale – No respecter of persons – Glossa – Strawman in the Courts.


(3) Pseudolaw Vexatious Litigants


This very thorough document contains a case by case analysis, along with pdf’s files of each decision, forming the complete litigation history of prominent pseudolaw-influenced vexatious litigants such as John Wilson, Wayne Glew, Brian Shaw, David Walter, Peter Gargan, Alan Skyring, Richard Gunter, Patrick Cusack, and Leonard Clampett.


More individuals documents will be added here.


Vaxatious Litigant and Australian Emergency Law

Public Notice regarding nomenclature in recent media articles