Posts

Hoxton Park Residents’ Action Group Inc. v Liverpool City Council [2010] NSWSC 1312

Hoxton Park Residents' Action Group Inc. v Liverpool City Council [2010] NSWSC 1312 concerned a development approval given by the Liverpool City Council (the first defendant), to the Malek Fahd Islamic School Ltd, (the second defendant). The third defendant was … Continue reading Hoxton Park Residents’ Action Group Inc. v Liverpool City Council [2010] NSWSC 1312
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership. If you are already a member, Log in here to be redirected back to this page.

Hockey and Anor and Owners Of Mount Bakewell Resort Strata Plan 18228 [2013] WASAT 64

In Hockey and Anor and Owners Of Mount Bakewell Resort Strata Plan 18228 [2013] WASAT 64 the applicants applied for an order appointing an administrator to a strata scheme which contains 13 lots. The owners of Lot 1, (which was used … Continue reading Hockey and Anor and Owners Of Mount Bakewell Resort Strata Plan 18228 [2013] WASAT 64
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership. If you are already a member, Log in here to be redirected back to this page.

Lizack and City Of Kalgoorlie-Boulder [2015] WASAT 20

In Lizack and City Of Kalgoorlie-Boulder [2015] WASAT 20 the applicant contended that the City had no lawful jurisdiction to make decisions affecting his use of the land in his certificate of title, arguments that were purported to be drawn … Continue reading Lizack and City Of Kalgoorlie-Boulder [2015] WASAT 20
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership. If you are already a member, Log in here to be redirected back to this page.

A Coram is not a Judge

It is a common belief among OPCA adherents that since case transcripts often have the name of the judge as "CORAM" it means that the person is not a true judge but someone without any authority or jurisdiction to decide … Continue reading A Coram is not a Judge
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership. If you are already a member, Log in here to be redirected back to this page.

Jakaj v Kinnane [2019] ACTSC 71

The applicant was convicted of using a mobile phone while driving a motor vehicle. He had a right of appeal from the orders made by the ACT Magistrates Court but he did not seek to exercise that right, and instead … Continue reading Jakaj v Kinnane [2019] ACTSC 71
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership. If you are already a member, Log in here to be redirected back to this page.

Leonard Clampett

Leonard Clampett ran a number of proposed constitutional arguments, but the main contention seems to be the section 115 currency argument which appears in many of his cases. He was also among the plaintiffs in Halliday v The Commonwealth of … Continue reading Leonard Clampett
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership. If you are already a member, Log in here to be redirected back to this page.

Norman v Heers (Trustee) [2016] FCA 821

I don't think I'll comment on Norman v Heers (Trustee) [2016] FCA 821, it is either self explanatory or incomprehensible: "I am of sound mind, i.e. this affidavit and the facts herein are the product of knowledge and creative-expression by … Continue reading Norman v Heers (Trustee) [2016] FCA 821
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership. If you are already a member, Log in here to be redirected back to this page.

The Doctrine of Judicial Immunity

One often sees assertions from various OPCA adherents that the judge is criminally liable, or even that they have "arrested" a judge, as in the case of Dezi Freeman and Jim Rech. who both "metaphorically" arrested magistrates, (as they were not … Continue reading The Doctrine of Judicial Immunity
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership. If you are already a member, Log in here to be redirected back to this page.

Finlayson v Indigenous Business Australia [2014] VSCA 95

In Finlayson v Indigenous Business Australia [2014] VSCA 95 the respondent had obtained a judgment for recovery of possession of land on the basis that the applicant had defaulted under the terms of his mortgage, and the applicant sought an … Continue reading Finlayson v Indigenous Business Australia [2014] VSCA 95
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership. If you are already a member, Log in here to be redirected back to this page.

Ibolya Szucs v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2007] FCA 1492

In Ibolya Szucs v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2007] FCA 1492 the applicant resisted a sequestration order that issued regarding an unpaid tax debt. The notice of appeal sought orders that the sequestration order be set aside, that the Deputy Commissioner … Continue reading Ibolya Szucs v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2007] FCA 1492
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership. If you are already a member, Log in here to be redirected back to this page.

Halliday v The Commonwealth of Australia [2000] FCA 950

In Halliday v The Commonwealth of Australia [2000] FCA 950 the applicants sought declarations that thirty three Acts and three regulations “establishing the New Taxation System and the Goods and Services Tax” were invalid.  The applicants were represented by David Fitzgibbon, … Continue reading Halliday v The Commonwealth of Australia [2000] FCA 950
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership. If you are already a member, Log in here to be redirected back to this page.

Poonon Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [1999] NSWSC 1121

In Poonon Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [1999] NSWSC 1121 the applicants resisted a winding up order, with David Fitzgibbon as counsel, instructed by Wayne Levick & Associates. The grounds included an issue relating to sovereignty which the … Continue reading Poonon Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [1999] NSWSC 1121
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership. If you are already a member, Log in here to be redirected back to this page.

Matchett & Lattimore v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2000] NSWSC 975; 45 ATR 541

In Matchett J M v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation; Lattimore J C v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation; Lattimore v M v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation; Matchett J F v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2000] NSWSC 975; 45 ATR 541 the plaintiffs … Continue reading Matchett & Lattimore v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2000] NSWSC 975; 45 ATR 541
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership. If you are already a member, Log in here to be redirected back to this page.

Dooney v Henry [2000] HCA 44 

In Dooney v Henry [2000] HCA 44 several matters were heard together, as the plaintiffs delivered Statements of Claim which all sought substantially the same relief and raised the same points for decision.  In every case a Reply had also been … Continue reading Dooney v Henry [2000] HCA 44 
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership. If you are already a member, Log in here to be redirected back to this page.

Miller v Chapman [2001] FCA 105

In Miller v Chapman [2001] FCA 105 the applicant had challenged his taxation assessments on the grounds the Australian Tax Office is not a legal entity, and the so-called “interregnum argument” based upon an asserted deficiency in the appointment of Lord … Continue reading Miller v Chapman [2001] FCA 105
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership. If you are already a member, Log in here to be redirected back to this page.

Arundel Chiropractic Centre Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2001] HCA 26

In Arundel Chiropractic Centre Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2001] HCA 26 the applicant resisted a statutory demand by the Deputy Commissioner of Taxation for unpaid taxes. The contention was that the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) was … Continue reading Arundel Chiropractic Centre Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2001] HCA 26
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership. If you are already a member, Log in here to be redirected back to this page.

The Institute of Taxation Research and Wayne Levick

The Institute of Taxation Research was formed in 1998, promising that one could make any tax liability voluntary if they used their services. The strategy centered around the proposition that the taxation legislation is invalid, as the whole legal system has … Continue reading The Institute of Taxation Research and Wayne Levick
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership. If you are already a member, Log in here to be redirected back to this page.

Walsh & Anor v Professional Nominees Pty Ltd & Anor [1998] QCA 259

In Walsh & Anor v Professional Nominees Pty Ltd & Anor [1998] QCA 259, the applicants appealed a foreclosure decision alleging that there is no valid law capable of being enforced, that there are no validly constituted courts, and even the … Continue reading Walsh & Anor v Professional Nominees Pty Ltd & Anor [1998] QCA 259
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership. If you are already a member, Log in here to be redirected back to this page.

Kings Seal – Letters Patent 1836

In the 2014 documentary "King's Seal" 1 it was alleged that consecutive governments have ignored the legal rights of Aboriginal people of South Australia contained in clause 8.1 of the Letters Patent 1836 (SA) 2 which provides: "PROVIDED ALWAYS that nothing … Continue reading Kings Seal – Letters Patent 1836
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership. If you are already a member, Log in here to be redirected back to this page.

The Civil Conscription Argument – Section 51(xxiiiA)

This pseudo legal myth has been circulating the internet for several years now, beginning I think with the No jab/No play policies in relation to children not up-to-date with the Childhood Vaccine Schedule attending Childcare Centres, and the No jab/No … Continue reading The Civil Conscription Argument – Section 51(xxiiiA)
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership. If you are already a member, Log in here to be redirected back to this page.

Hopes v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2016] WASC 198

In Hopes v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2016] WASC 198 the appellant resisted the liquidation of his company, alleging that the Commonwealth Parliament lacked power to enact the Royal Style and Titles Act 1973 (Cth) meaning that legislation passed since the … Continue reading Hopes v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2016] WASC 198
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership. If you are already a member, Log in here to be redirected back to this page.

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Queensland Rail [2015] HCA 11

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Queensland Rail [2015] HCA 11 This case is often mistakenly cited by OPCA adherents as evidence that all governments and their departments are corporations, and therefore … Continue reading Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Queensland Rail [2015] HCA 11
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership. If you are already a member, Log in here to be redirected back to this page.

The Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Argument (OPCA) Litigant Case

Jonnette Watson Hamilton; "The Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Argument (OPCA) Litigant Case" A summary of Meads v. Meads 2012 ABQB 571 https://freemandelusion.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/the-organized-pseudolegal-commercial-argument-opca-litigant-case.pdf . http://ablawg.ca/2012/10/30/the-organized-pseudolegal-commercial-argument-opca-litigant-case/ https://freemandelusion.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/the-organized-pseudolegal-commercial-argument-opca-litigant-case.pdfShare this:TweetMoreShare on TumblrWhatsAppEmailPocketTelegramLike this:Like Loading...
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership. If you are already a member, Log in here to be redirected back to this page.

McKewins Hairdressing and Beauty Supplies Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2000] HCA 27

In McKewins Hairdressing and Beauty Supplies Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2000] HCA 27, Mr Wayne Levick appeared on behalf of the applicants, challenging the validity of the commission and appointment of the Office of Governor-General. The court responded: … Continue reading McKewins Hairdressing and Beauty Supplies Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2000] HCA 27
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership. If you are already a member, Log in here to be redirected back to this page.

Money Tree Management Service Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (No 3) [2000] SASC 286; 45 ATR 262

In Money Tree Management Service Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (No 3) [2000] SASC 286; 45 ATR 262 the appellants raised a challenge against the validity of the commission and appointments of the Office of Governor and Chief Justice. … Continue reading Money Tree Management Service Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (No 3) [2000] SASC 286; 45 ATR 262
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership. If you are already a member, Log in here to be redirected back to this page.

Plenty v Dillon (1991) HCA 5

In Plenty v Dillon (1991) HCA 5 the High Court of Australia held that police officers who entered the appellant's farm to serve a summons did not have express or implied consent for entry and therefore committed a trespass. This case is … Continue reading Plenty v Dillon (1991) HCA 5
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership. If you are already a member, Log in here to be redirected back to this page.

Bride v Shire of Katanning [2017] WASCA 59

In Shire of Katanning v Bride [No 2] [2016] WASC 314 an order was made under the Vexatious Proceedings Restriction Act 2002 (WA), that: "The first and second defendants, either personally or in a representative capacity, are hereby prohibited from instituting … Continue reading Bride v Shire of Katanning [2017] WASCA 59
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership. If you are already a member, Log in here to be redirected back to this page.

ANZ Banking Group Ltd v Bankseea Pty Ltd [2017] VCC 1852

In ANZ Banking Group Ltd v Bankseea Pty Ltd [2017] VCC 1852 the defendants appealed a summary judgment by the bank, "...on the grounds that it is fraudulent, misleading, with the intention to deceive the court and as well as being … Continue reading ANZ Banking Group Ltd v Bankseea Pty Ltd [2017] VCC 1852
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership. If you are already a member, Log in here to be redirected back to this page.

ACM Group Limited v McClymont [2014] FCCA 2581

In ACM Group Limited v McClymont [2014] FCCA 2581 the defendant argued that Westpac should account to him for the amount it received for the debt from the petitioning creditor because it was his signature on the credit contract that created … Continue reading ACM Group Limited v McClymont [2014] FCCA 2581
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership. If you are already a member, Log in here to be redirected back to this page.

Summerland Credit Union Ltd v Lamberton; Summerland Credit Union Ltd v Jonathan [2014] NSWSC 547

In Summerland Credit Union Ltd v Lamberton; Summerland Credit Union Ltd v Jonathan [2014] NSWSC 547 the defendants resisted foreclosure of their properties, signing their names with trademark symbols: "I, Jonathan©"TM" am no aware of any documents relating to case number … Continue reading Summerland Credit Union Ltd v Lamberton; Summerland Credit Union Ltd v Jonathan [2014] NSWSC 547
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership. If you are already a member, Log in here to be redirected back to this page.

Bertola v Australian and New Zealand Banking Corporation [2014] FCA 609

In Bertola v Australian and New Zealand Banking Corporation [2014] FCA 609 the applicants were represented by a non-lawyer, Peter Paalvast, seeking an order to block liquidation of their farm. They had annotated a copy of a judgment for the sale … Continue reading Bertola v Australian and New Zealand Banking Corporation [2014] FCA 609
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership. If you are already a member, Log in here to be redirected back to this page.

National Australia Bank Limited v Norman [2012] VSC 14

In National Australia Bank Limited v Norman [2012] VSC 14 the court noted: "The counterclaim was comprised of random, almost incomprehensible, statements, propositions, quotations, argument and references to other material that appeared to have been lifted from other documents and randomly … Continue reading National Australia Bank Limited v Norman [2012] VSC 14
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership. If you are already a member, Log in here to be redirected back to this page.

Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Sproule [2012] FMCA 1188

In Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Sproule [2012] FMCA 1188 the defendant fought a sequestration order with what appears to be a foisted contract seeking to estop the collection action, arguing that he had "...prepared a bill of exchange with a … Continue reading Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Sproule [2012] FMCA 1188
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership. If you are already a member, Log in here to be redirected back to this page.

Shields v Cbfc Limited [1994] FCA 1311

In Shields v Cbfc Limited [1994] FCA 1311 the appellants alleged bias by the primary judge, denying that they were obliged to make payments on a rent contract because the alleged debt was “created by the respondent as a book entry … Continue reading Shields v Cbfc Limited [1994] FCA 1311
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership. If you are already a member, Log in here to be redirected back to this page.

Westpac Banking Corporation v Mason [2011] NSWSC 1241

In Westpac Banking Corporation v Mason [2011] NSWSC 1241 the defendants attempted to avoid foreclosure arguing that securitizing a loan is misleading, deceptive, and unconscionable conduct, and that the bank could not enforce the loan agreement, as it had: "...already received … Continue reading Westpac Banking Corporation v Mason [2011] NSWSC 1241
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership. If you are already a member, Log in here to be redirected back to this page.

Puglia v RHG Mortgage Corporation Ltd [2013] WASCA 143

In Puglia v RHG Mortgage Corporation Ltd [2013] WASCA 143 the court rejected the securitization argument contended by the appellants,  alleging that: "the respondent had 'sold' the mortgage and failed to disclose this, and the applicants had not received any consideration … Continue reading Puglia v RHG Mortgage Corporation Ltd [2013] WASCA 143
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership. If you are already a member, Log in here to be redirected back to this page.

RHG Mortgage Corporation Ltd v Astolfi [2011] NSWSC 1526

In RHG Mortgage Corporation Ltd v Astolfi [2011] NSWSC 1526 the respondent resisted an attempt to foreclose on her property, arguing that the mortgage could not be enforced because it had been securitized. The court struck out the pleadings responding that … Continue reading RHG Mortgage Corporation Ltd v Astolfi [2011] NSWSC 1526
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership. If you are already a member, Log in here to be redirected back to this page.

Mills-Edward v Russell [2011] WADC 9

In Mills-Edward v Russell [2011] WADC 9 the appellant argued the lower court decision was invalid because the court was not a Chapter III court and that the magistrate swore an oath of allegiance to "the State of Western Australia". "As … Continue reading Mills-Edward v Russell [2011] WADC 9
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership. If you are already a member, Log in here to be redirected back to this page.

Flynn v National Australia Bank, [2009] WASCA 168

In Flynn v National Australia Bank, [2009] WASCA 168 the applicant sought a stay of a foreclosure order, with a "series of propositions appearing under the heading 'Philosophical Argument,' the central tenet of which seems to be that the bank was … Continue reading Flynn v National Australia Bank, [2009] WASCA 168
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership. If you are already a member, Log in here to be redirected back to this page.

Donnellan v Garlick [2006] NSWSC 132

In Donnellan v Garlick [2006] NSWSC 132 the respondent served “quite inappropriate documents” on the court, such as “Letters Rogatory”, “Deed of Security”, “Certificate of Protest and Non-Response” which indicate a foisted contract was attempted. The documents were also notarized, as … Continue reading Donnellan v Garlick [2006] NSWSC 132
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership. If you are already a member, Log in here to be redirected back to this page.