The Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Argument (OPCA) Litigant Case

Jonnette Watson Hamilton; "The Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Argument (OPCA) Litigant Case" A summary of Meads v. Meads 2012 ABQB 571 https://freemandelusion.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/the-organized-pseudolegal-commercial-argument-opca-litigant-case.pdf . http://ablawg.ca/2012/10/30/the-organized-pseudolegal-commercial-argument-opca-litigant-case/ https://freemandelusion.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/the-organized-pseudolegal-commercial-argument-opca-litigant-case.pdfShare this:TweetMoreShare on TumblrWhatsAppEmailPocketTelegramLike this:Like Loading...
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership

What is an OPCA adherent?

The term "OPCA adherent" or "OPCA litigant" appears frequently through this website. "OPCA" is an acronym of the term "Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Argument" which is the main type of pseudo legal contention being raised in courts, and in popular intercourse … Continue reading What is an OPCA adherent?
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership

Meads v. Meads 2012 ABQB 571

Meads v Meads 2012 ABQB 571 “This Court has developed a new awareness and understanding of a category of vexatious litigant. As we shall see, while there is often a lack of homogeneity, and some individuals or groups have no … Continue reading Meads v. Meads 2012 ABQB 571
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership

Ennis v Credit Union Australia [2016] FCCA 1705

Ennis v Credit Union Australia [2016] FCCA 1705 "The argument described in the material is an “Organised Pseudolegal Commercial Argument” and there are, as the respondents submissions point out, a number of hallmarks to that type of approach which are … Continue reading Ennis v Credit Union Australia [2016] FCCA 1705
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership

Kosteska v Magistrate Manthey & Anor [2013] QCA 105

Kosteska v Phillips; Kosteska v Commissioner of Police [2011] QCA 266 The applicant contended that the Court of Appeal was not a lawfully established court and raised a complaint that the only form of legal tender was gold or silver … Continue reading Kosteska v Magistrate Manthey & Anor [2013] QCA 105
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership

Adelaide City Council v Lepse [2016] SASC 66

Adelaide City Council v Lepse [2016] SASC 66 was the appeal of a parking ticket conviction and fine. At the trial the defendant stood at the courtroom door and when the Lepse matter was called identified herself by her first … Continue reading Adelaide City Council v Lepse [2016] SASC 66
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership

Lion Finance Pty Ltd v Johnston [2018] FCCA 2745

Lion Finance Pty Ltd v Johnston [2018] FCCA 2745 "Having read the applicant's (Johnston) material I formed the view that the applicant (Johnston) was seeking to avoid payment of her debt by engaging in an argument which has found some … Continue reading Lion Finance Pty Ltd v Johnston [2018] FCCA 2745
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership

Coshott v Spencer [2016] NSWDC 43

Coshott v Spencer [2016] NSWDC 43 "As to the principles of construction of statutes generally in “no jurisdiction” applications, I note generally the comprehensive analysis of the relevant principles in Meads v Meads [2012] ABQB 571 and SAS Trustee Corporation … Continue reading Coshott v Spencer [2016] NSWDC 43
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership

ACM Group Ltd v Jenner [2014] QMC 7

ACM Group Ltd v Jenner [2014] QMC 7 "The A4V notice and the “certified agreement” are unilateral “quasi-agreements” unsupported by valuable consideration. Neither is binding on the involuntary party. The documents do not create formal legal relations or contractual consequences … Continue reading ACM Group Ltd v Jenner [2014] QMC 7
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership

Hewitt & Corbett & Anor [2016] FCCA 776

In Hewitt & Corbett & Anor [2016] FCCA 776 the husband claimed he comes under the higher jurisdiction of the “UCADIA BYLAWS”, with all registrations of property and records (birth certificate etc). He claims that a property settlement between the wife … Continue reading Hewitt & Corbett & Anor [2016] FCCA 776
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Nuera Health Pty Ltd (No 2) [2007] FCA 1756

In Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Nuera Health Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) [2007] FCA 695 there were orders made granting injunctions based on findings of contraventions of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) against the respondents, which was of … Continue reading Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Nuera Health Pty Ltd (No 2) [2007] FCA 1756
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership

The Aussie OPCA Sphere

“Following the rise of the “Strawman,” a kind of new, international pseudolegal tradition has emerged with accepted elements from many different sources, entwined with a matrix of false or distorted history and conspiratorial belief. This might be called the “OPCAsphere.” … Continue reading The Aussie OPCA Sphere
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership

Sovereign characters

Ernie Tertelgte is an interesting OPCA character. He was initially only charged for fishing without a fishing licence, but was notably passionate in his in-court responses. As is often the alleged conclusion with OPCA mentions, he “dismissed the matter” and … Continue reading Sovereign characters
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership

A Systematised Delusion

"You study the dark for its secrets. You study the light for its power. Once you start to see the insanity, that's part of your sanity. If you can't see the insanity, it's because you are swimming in it." - … Continue reading A Systematised Delusion
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership

Vexatious litigation

Extract from Kosteska v Magistrate Manthey & Anor [2013] QCA 105: 1 "This is not the first case in which Ms Kosteska‟s argument has been advanced. It, and others like it, have wasted the time of the courts and opposing litigants, … Continue reading Vexatious litigation
To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership