Donald J. Netolitzky; “A Pathogen Astride the Minds of Men: The Epidemiological History of Pseudolaw” (2018) “Pseudolaw is a collection of legal-sounding but false rules that purport to be law. Pseudolaw has independently emerged in different countries and communities on … Continue reading A Pathogen Astride the Minds of Men: The Epidemiological History of Pseudolaw →

The Canadian Network for Research on Terrorism, Security, and Society; “Broadening our Understanding of Anti-Authority Movements in Canada” (2017) “Academic explorations of anti-authority movements are virtually non-existent in Canada. We have no reliable primary data or empirical insights into Freemen-on-the-Land … Continue reading Broadening our Understanding of Anti-Authority Movements in Canada →

Donald J. Netolitzky; “A Rebellion of Furious Paper: Pseudolaw as a Revolutionary Legal System” (2018) “Pseudolaw is a collection of legal-sounding but false rules that purport to be law. Though pseudolaw is now encountered by courts and government actors in … Continue reading A Rebellion of Furious Paper: Pseudolaw as a Revolutionary Legal System →

Jonnette Watson Hamilton and Alice Woolley; “What has Meads v Meads wrought?” “Associate Chief Justice John D. Rooke’s decision in Meads v Meads, 2012 ABQB 571 (CanLII) — one of CanLII’s Top Ten Cases of 2012 — established a category … Continue reading What has Meads v Meads wrought? →

Donald J. Netolitzky; “The History of the Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Argument Phenomena in Canada” “This article discusses the history of the poorly understood Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Arguments (OPCA) phenomena. Drawing from various reported and unreported sources, the author begins his … Continue reading History of the OPCA Phenomena in Canada →

Unrau v National Dental Examining Board, 2019 ABQB 283; Reasons for Decision of the Associate Chief Justice J.D. Rooke https://freemandelusion.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/unrau-v-national-dental-examining-board-reasons-for-decision.pdf . https://www.albertacourts.ca/docs/default-source/qb/unrau-v-national-dental-examining-board—reasons-for-decision.pdf?sfvrsn=1fe6ba80_2 https://freemandelusion.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/unrau-v-national-dental-examining-board-reasons-for-decision.pdf

Robert Machado, Armoured Suits; “Organised Pseudolegal Commercial Argument Phenomenon – Memo of Law” (2019) https://freemandelusion.files.wordpress.com/2020/09/organized-pseudolegal-commercial-argument-memo-of-law.pdf . https://armouredsuits.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Organized-Pseudolegal-Commercial-Argument-Memo-of-Law.pdf https://freemandelusion.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/organized-pseudolegal-commercial-argument-memo-of-law.pdf

Donald J. Netolitzky; “After the Hammer: Six Years of Meads v. Meads” (2019) https://freemandelusion.files.wordpress.com/2018/07/2548-article-text-2723-1-10-20190717.pdf . https://www.albertalawreview.com/index.php/ALR/article/view/2548 https://freemandelusion.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/2548-article-text-2723-1-10-20190717.pdf

Donald J Netolitzky, “Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Arguments in Canadian Inter-Partner Family Law Court Disputes” https://freemandelusion.files.wordpress.com/2018/07/2017canliidocs93.pdf . https://commentary.canlii.org/w/canlii/2017CanLIIDocs93#!fragment//BQCwhgziBcwMYgK4DsDWszIQewE4BUBTADwBdoByCgSgBpltTCIBFRQ3AT0otojlzYANkIDCSNNACEyPoTC4EbDtypyFCAMp5SAIW4AlAKIAZIwDUAggDlRR2qTAAjaKWxxq1IA https://freemandelusion.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/2017canliidocs93.pdf

Donald J. Netolitzky, “Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Argument in Canada; an Attack on the Legal System”  (2015) https://freemandelusion.files.wordpress.com/2018/07/netolitzky-opcaattackonlegalsystem.pdf . https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306056316_Organized_Pseudolegal_Commercial_Arguments_OPCA_in_Canada_an_Attack_on_the_Legal_System https://freemandelusion.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/netolitzky-opcaattackonlegalsystem.pdf

Donald J. Netolitzky and Richard Warman; “Enjoy the silence: Pseudolaw at the Supreme Court of Canada” Pseudolaw is a collection of legal-sounding but false rules that purport to be law, employed by groups including the Detaxer and Freemen -on-the-Land movements. … Continue reading Pseudolaw at the Supreme Court of Canada →

“The “Strawman” is therefore not merely a myth. It is litigation poison.” – Fiander v Mills,2015 NLCA 31 Extract from Rothweiler v Payette, 2018 ABQB 288:  [1] ……. Reduced to its conceptual core, the ‘Strawman’ concept is one that alleges … Continue reading Canada: “Litigation Terrorism” →

Donald Netolitzky; Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Arguments [“OPCA”] as Magic and Ceremony https://freemandelusion.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/netolitzky-opcamagicceremony.pdf . https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321936848_Organized_Pseudolegal_Commercial_Arguments_OPCA_as_Magic_and_Ceremony https://freemandelusion.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/netolitzky-opcamagicceremony.pdf