In Pawlak v Police [2017] SASC 40 the appellant appealed his speeding camera fine on numerous grounds, such as the accuracy of the readings taken by the device, challenges to the jurisdiction of the Magistrates Court as it did not conform to Chapter III of the Commonwealth Constitution, and demanded proof that the Road Traffic Act had received assent, including copies of the relevant Gazzette and Hansard.
Click to access pawlak-v-police-2017-sasc-40.pdf
.
You must log in to post a comment.