Bride v Shire of Katanning [2017] WASCA 59

In Shire of Katanning v Bride [No 2] [2016] WASC 314 an order was made under the Vexatious Proceedings Restriction Act 2002 (WA), that: "The first and second defendants, either personally or in a representative capacity, are hereby prohibited from instituting any action, proceeding, appeal, counterclaim or other application in any Court of the State Western … Continue reading Bride v Shire of Katanning [2017] WASCA 59 →Share this:TweetMoreShare on TumblrWhatsAppEmailPocketTelegramLike this:Like Loading...
To access this post, you must purchase VIP Annual Membership, 1 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or 3 Month Membership.

Members Equity Bank Pty Ltd v Elefterescu [2018] VSC 223

In Members Equity Bank Pty Ltd v Elefterescu [2018] VSC 223 the second defendant contended that Associate Justice Lansdowne refused the challenge to her standing, which raised the need to issue notices under s 78B of the Judiciary Act 1902 (Cth) on the basis of the effect of ‘the removal of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II … Continue reading Members Equity Bank Pty Ltd v Elefterescu [2018] VSC 223 →Share this:TweetMoreShare on TumblrWhatsAppEmailPocketTelegramLike this:Like Loading...
To access this post, you must purchase VIP Annual Membership, 1 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or 3 Month Membership.

Donohue v Victorian Electoral Commission [2015] VSC 98

In Donohue v Victorian Electoral Commission [2015] VSC 98 Garde J considered an application by GJ Donohue to restrain the State general election.  The statement of issues relied upon included: The removal of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Her heirs and successors and subjects from statute law within the State of Western Australia The creation … Continue reading Donohue v Victorian Electoral Commission [2015] VSC 98 →Share this:TweetMoreShare on TumblrWhatsAppEmailPocketTelegramLike this:Like Loading...
To access this post, you must purchase VIP Annual Membership, 1 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or 3 Month Membership.

Peter Scott Haughton

Peter Scott Haughton ran a series of cases in 2019-2020, here are a few of those that are published. (1) Haughton v Roder [2019] SASC 199  (2) Haughton v Chapman [2019] SASC 200  (3) Haughton v Australia And New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2019] SASC 198 (4) Haughton v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group … Continue reading Peter Scott Haughton → Share this:TweetMoreShare on TumblrWhatsAppEmailPocketTelegramLike this:Like Loading...
To access this post, you must purchase VIP Annual Membership, 1 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or 3 Month Membership.

James Rech

Like many other failed constitutional theorists in the past, James Rech has styled himself as a "Commonwealth Public Official" which he claims endows him with powers over the judiciary and government. His contentions are borrowed from vexatious litigants Wayne Glew and Brian Shaw, relating to "the Crown being removed from the states" due to amendments to … Continue reading James Rech →Share this:TweetMoreShare on TumblrWhatsAppEmailPocketTelegramLike this:Like Loading...
To access this post, you must purchase VIP Annual Membership, 1 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or 3 Month Membership.

Dezi Freeman

Dezi Freeman "metaphorically" arrests a Magistrate!! There is an internet rumour being spread in facebook groups that OPCA adherent Dezi Freeman "arrested magistrate Ian Watkins" during a "civil hearing he was presiding over in the Wangaratta Magistrates Court" on Friday the 31st of May 2019. The post in a Facebook page called Alpine Regional News, (which quite ironically, … Continue reading Dezi Freeman → Share this:TweetMoreShare on TumblrWhatsAppEmailPocketTelegramLike this:Like Loading...
To access this post, you must purchase VIP Annual Membership, 1 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or 3 Month Membership.

Brian Shaw

Brian Shaw argues with a non-existent court in Shaw v Attorney-General for the State of Victoria [2011] VSCA 63 (All credits to Justice Maxwell for the theme): 1 "If the Constitution Act 1975 (Vic) is invalid, it follows that this is not a validly–constituted court and, if it is not a valid court, then there … Continue reading Brian Shaw → Share this:TweetMoreShare on TumblrWhatsAppEmailPocketTelegramLike this:Like Loading...
To access this post, you must purchase VIP Annual Membership, 1 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or 3 Month Membership.