Leonard Clampett ran a number of proposed constitutional arguments, but the main contention seems to be the section 115 currency argument which appears in many of his cases. He was also among the plaintiffs in Halliday v The Commonwealth of Australia [2000] FCA 950 which contested the Goods and Services Tax, and the New Tax … Continue reading Leonard Clampett
Tag: Unlicensed
Kobylski v Cole [2006] QDC 308
Kobylski v Cole, Kobylski v Edwards, Kobylski v Wellington, Kobylski v Riordan, Kobylski v King [2006] QDC 308 was a joint judgement in relation to the fake licencing and registration scheme set up by Malcolm McClure of UPMART. “The relevant facts in respect of each of the five sets of appeals are remarkably similar. The … Continue reading Kobylski v Cole [2006] QDC 308
Maxwell Hugh Wilson
Maxwell and Dorothy Wilson received a sequestration order and failed to make out and file with the Official Receiver a statement of affairs, and were subsequently convicted. They contended that the manner in which the magistrate had proceeded was unlawful by virtue of the provisions about discrimination contained in the International Covenant on Civil and Political … Continue reading Maxwell Hugh Wilson
Independent Sovereign State of Australia
The "Independent Sovereign State of Australia" was an attempt at secession from Australia, but not in the usual form. It claimed to be a body politic of its own, with members in each State, who by their association, meant their land was ceded from Australia, and they themselves not subject to the laws of Australia … Continue reading Independent Sovereign State of Australia
Barrett-Lennard v Bembridge [2015] WASC 353
In BarrettLennard -v- Bembridge [2015] WASC 353 the appellant contended Biblical law is supreme and that the magistrate refused to hear Biblical references as vowed to be upheld by its supreme governor Queen Elizabeth II in her Coronation oath, and that due to Deuteronomy 4:2 Christians cannot be compelled to hold a drivers licence, give accurate details … Continue reading Barrett-Lennard v Bembridge [2015] WASC 353
Harkness v Roberts; Kyriazis v County Court of Victoria (No 2) [2017] VSC 646
These two cases were initially heard together by Bell J in the Supreme Court in Harkness v Roberts; Kyriazis v County Court of Victoria (No 2) [2017] VSC 646, (Kyriazis v County Court of Victoria (No 1) [2017] VSC 636 was an application to audio-record a judicial review proceeding by a self-represented party). In this … Continue reading Harkness v Roberts; Kyriazis v County Court of Victoria (No 2) [2017] VSC 646
Gregory John Tudehope
A magistrate issued a warrant for the arrest of a Manoora man who stormed out of court and swore after arguing Queensland law did not apply to him. Gregory John Tudehope, 64, was pulled over in Manunda with his car allegedly sporting homemade numberplates registered to the “Tudehope Family Estate”. The apparent sovereign citizen allegedly … Continue reading Gregory John Tudehope
Kosteska v Magistrate Manthey & Anor [2013] QCA 105
Kosteska v Phillips; Kosteska v Commissioner of Police [2011] QCA 266 The applicant contended that the Court of Appeal was not a lawfully established court and raised a complaint that the only form of legal tender was gold or silver coin, in defence of a cannabis charge. Of note in this case is the references … Continue reading Kosteska v Magistrate Manthey & Anor [2013] QCA 105
R v Stoneman [2013] QCA 209
In R v Stoneman [2013] QCA 209 the applicant contended judicial bias for not upholding "an unalienable right of the private individual to use the common ways to travel as per the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" without a licence, insisting only the use of a motor vehicle for commercial purposes is … Continue reading R v Stoneman [2013] QCA 209
U.S. case law: licence v freedom of travel
I have read quite a few comments from people online in Australia, that there exists in the U.S. a legal method that allows Americans to drive without a license. As you will see, there is no "common law right" to "travel" in the U.S. (as in the OPCA concept of driving unlicenced, by "automobile") nor … Continue reading U.S. case law: licence v freedom of travel
Rainima v Magistrate Freund [2008] NSWSC 944
Rainima v Magistrate Freund [2008] NSWSC 944: "It seems that the group (UPMART) holds strong views about the legitimacy of aspects of this State’s traffic legislation. Certainly, the plaintiff does. Whatever the views of the group might be, this appeal turns upon the attitude of the plaintiff as it was articulated by her in the … Continue reading Rainima v Magistrate Freund [2008] NSWSC 944
Dax Coxon
News: "Gold Coast Pirates of the Caribbean actor says he will drive unlicensed again despite conviction": Gold Coast Pirates of the Caribbean actor says he will drive unlicensed again despite conviction. Dax Coxon, whose online profile says he starred alongside Johnny Depp in Pirates of the Caribbean 5: Dead Men Tell No Tales, filmed on … Continue reading Dax Coxon
Sam Jones
Sam Jones operates the Corporate Australia website. There are countless articles on his website relating to the "strawman" and "common law" myths, with an added twist of the "corporate government" myth to incite an emotional response from the reader, to "fire them up" about how truly terrible it is that we are living under occupation by a … Continue reading Sam Jones
Van den Hoorn v Ellis [2010] QDC 451
In Van den Hoorn v Ellis [2010] QDC 451 the appellant contended he was the “owner of the created fictions known as JOHAN HENDRICK VAN DEN HOORN and JOHN HENRY VAN DEN HOORN, being created fictions fraudulently owned and controlled by legal fictions” which included “australia inc” and “queensland inc”, as well as “queensland transport inc” … Continue reading Van den Hoorn v Ellis [2010] QDC 451
Early OPCA Influence in Australia
Throughout the 2000s, OPCA concepts became increasingly cross-contaminated. Foreign concepts and legislation, such as A4V and the Uniform Commercial Code became common features in OPCA legal proceedings in the Commonwealth, sometimes alone and sometimes in combination with domestic concepts. This borrowing is obvious in different movements, for example, the double or split person concept and … Continue reading Early OPCA Influence in Australia
You must be logged in to post a comment.