Szita v Capital Finance Australia Limited (2004) FCA 477

Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Arguments
Szita v Capital Finance Australia Limited (2004) FCA 477 The appellant claimed that by sending to Capital a document call a “certified promissory note” specifying an amount of $116,375.95, Mr Szita has discharged any liability to Capital. The Court concluded that Mr Szita’s claim is manifestly hopeless, wholly untenable, incapable of constituting tender of payment, and sufficient to discharge the debt. Click to access szita-v-capital-finance-australia-limited-2004-fca-477.pdf Capital Finance Australia LTD v Szita [2005] FMCA 1938 was regarding a sequestration order against … Continue reading Szita v Capital Finance Australia Limited (2004) FCA 477 →
To access this post, you must purchase VIP Annual Membership, 1 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or 3 Month Membership.
Published