To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 6 Month Membership, 12 Month Membership or Gold Membership. If you are already a member, Log in here to be redirected back to this page.
Szita v Capital Finance Australia Limited (2004) FCA 477
In Szita v Capital Finance Australia Limited (2004) FCA 477, the appellant claimed that by sending to Capital a document call a “certified promissory note” specifying an amount of $116,375.95, he had discharged any liability to Capital. The Court concluded that … Continue reading Szita v Capital Finance Australia Limited (2004) FCA 477