In Szita v Capital Finance Australia Limited (2004) FCA 477, the appellant claimed that by sending to Capital a document call a “certified promissory note” specifying an amount of $116,375.95, he had discharged any liability to Capital. The Court concluded that … Continue reading Szita v Capital Finance Australia Limited (2004) FCA 477
To access the encyclopedia content, please renew your Website Access.
If you are already a member, Log in here to be redirected back to this page. Alternatively, documents are available on the homepage.