O’Hagan v Commissioner of Taxation [2020] QDC 288

In O’Hagan v Commissioner of Taxation [2020] QDC 288 the applicant was found guilty after a summary trial of four offences of failing when and as required pursuant to a taxation law to give a return to the Commissioner of Taxation. The appellant appealed his conviction and sentence on grounds that included the Magistrates Court … Continue reading O’Hagan v Commissioner of Taxation [2020] QDC 288 →Share this:TweetMoreShare on TumblrWhatsAppEmailPocketTelegramLike this:Like Loading...
To access this post, you must purchase VIP Annual Membership, 1 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or 3 Month Membership.

Summerland Credit Union Ltd v Lamberton; Summerland Credit Union Ltd v Jonathan [2014] NSWSC 547

In Summerland Credit Union Ltd v Lamberton; Summerland Credit Union Ltd v Jonathan [2014] NSWSC 547 the defendants resisted foreclosure of their properties, signing their names with trademark symbols: "I, Jonathan©"TM" am no aware of any documents relating to case number 13/372819 being lawfully served on Debra Ann Lamberton©"TM" in Adelaide or at her tenanted address … Continue reading Summerland Credit Union Ltd v Lamberton; Summerland Credit Union Ltd v Jonathan [2014] NSWSC 547 →Share this:TweetMoreShare on TumblrWhatsAppEmailPocketTelegramLike this:Like Loading...
To access this post, you must purchase VIP Annual Membership, 1 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or 3 Month Membership.

Brian Charles Fyffe

In Fyffe v State of Victoria [1999] VSCA 196 the applicant, who was renting a property through the Ministry for Conservation, Forests and Lands, claimed to have seceded the property from the State of Victoria, and by virtue of his diplomatic status he and the land are protected by international law from any claimed sovereignty … Continue reading Brian Charles Fyffe →Share this:TweetMoreShare on TumblrWhatsAppEmailPocketTelegramLike this:Like Loading...
To access this post, you must purchase VIP Annual Membership, 1 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or 3 Month Membership.

Basham v City of Joondalup [2015] WASC 345

The appellant was convicted of a minor parking fine which he contested, and was fined $60 and ordered to pay costs of $1,478.70. The appellant sought leave to appeal from the conviction, and the costs order on the grounds it was manifestly excessive, in Basham v City of Joondalup [2015] WASC 345. The appellant claimed … Continue reading Basham v City of Joondalup [2015] WASC 345 →Share this:TweetMoreShare on TumblrWhatsAppEmailPocketTelegramLike this:Like Loading...
To access this post, you must purchase VIP Annual Membership, 1 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or 3 Month Membership.

Koula Rafailidis

Koula Rafailidis 1 is an OPCA adherent from New South Wales, and a long time admin of the Get out of paying fines, rego, fees, tolls and rates 2 and several other Facebook groups. In Camden Council v Rafailidis [2012] NSWLEC 51 3 the respondents were found in breach of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act … Continue reading Koula Rafailidis →Share this:TweetMoreShare on TumblrWhatsAppEmailPocketTelegramLike this:Like Loading...
To access this post, you must purchase VIP Annual Membership, 1 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or 3 Month Membership.

Firstmac Fiduciary Services Pty Limited v Gilmour [2013] NSWSC 255

Firstmac Fiduciary Services Pty Ltd was granted a writ of restitution in Firstmac Fiduciary Services Pty Limited v Gilmour [2013] NSWSC 255 to recover possession of property from the defendant, after he defaulted on a loan. He refused to give vacant possession of the property, and the sheriff was called to evict him, change the … Continue reading Firstmac Fiduciary Services Pty Limited v Gilmour [2013] NSWSC 255 →Share this:TweetMoreShare on TumblrWhatsAppEmailPocketTelegramLike this:Like Loading...
To access this post, you must purchase VIP Annual Membership, 1 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or 3 Month Membership.

Ledger Acquisitions Australia MB Pty Ltd v Kiefer [2014] FCCA 2216

The respondent made an application for review of the making of a sequestration order against his estate, but the court ordered that the application for review be dismissed, and published its reasons for judgment in Ledger Acquisitions Australia MB Pty Ltd v Kiefer [2014] FCCA 2216. The grounds in the submissions challenged the jurisdiction of … Continue reading Ledger Acquisitions Australia MB Pty Ltd v Kiefer [2014] FCCA 2216 →Share this:TweetMoreShare on TumblrWhatsAppEmailPocketTelegramLike this:Like Loading...
To access this post, you must purchase VIP Annual Membership, 1 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or 3 Month Membership.

Wilson v White [2007] WASCA 87

The appellants received a sequestration order and failed to make out and file with the Official Receiver a statement of affairs, and were subsequently convicted. They contended that the manner in which the magistrate had proceeded was unlawful by virtue of the provisions about discrimination contained in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, … Continue reading Wilson v White [2007] WASCA 87 →Share this:TweetMoreShare on TumblrWhatsAppEmailPocketTelegramLike this:Like Loading...
To access this post, you must purchase VIP Annual Membership, 1 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or 3 Month Membership.

Stearman v Taylor [2014] WASC 247

The appellant was charged with refusing to stop the vehicle,  drive while suspended, and refusing to supply his personal details when requested. At the Magistrates Court he claimed that he was entitled to be tried before a jury, but the magistrate stated that the appellant had only been charged with summary offences.  "There then followed … Continue reading Stearman v Taylor [2014] WASC 247 →Share this:TweetMoreShare on TumblrWhatsAppEmailPocketTelegramLike this:Like Loading...
To access this post, you must purchase VIP Annual Membership, 1 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or 3 Month Membership.

Jackson v Western Australia Police [2014] WASC 72

The appellant was charged with trespassing and obstruction offences. At the Magistrates Court he demanded a trial by jury per Chapter 29 of the Magna Carta, which was refused and he was convicted of the summary offences. He appealed in Jackson v Western Australia Police [2014] WASC 72, arguing the denial of a jury trial … Continue reading Jackson v Western Australia Police [2014] WASC 72 →Share this:TweetMoreShare on TumblrWhatsAppEmailPocketTelegramLike this:Like Loading...
To access this post, you must purchase VIP Annual Membership, 1 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or 3 Month Membership.

Whiting v Whiting & Anor [2014] QSC 187

The plaintiff commenced proceedings in Whiting v Whiting & Anor [2014] QSC 187 describing himself as "his Royal Highness, King of the Whiting Kingdom, Baron of the Whiting Region, King Steven 1 ATF Steven James Whiting".  His claim was brought against his former wife and her lawyers, which he described as "Compensation for damages caused … Continue reading Whiting v Whiting & Anor [2014] QSC 187 →Share this:TweetMoreShare on TumblrWhatsAppEmailPocketTelegramLike this:Like Loading...
To access this post, you must purchase VIP Annual Membership, 1 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or 3 Month Membership.

Baker v New South Wales Police [2013] NSWSC 57

The appellant was convicted of refusing to provide a breath sample, speeding, and not producing a driver’s licence. He appealed in Baker v New South Wales Police [2013] NSWSC 57 on the grounds he was denied his “inalienable right to trial by jury”, and demanded $250,000.00 in damages. He also contended that all judges must be … Continue reading Baker v New South Wales Police [2013] NSWSC 57 →Share this:TweetMoreShare on TumblrWhatsAppEmailPocketTelegramLike this:Like Loading...
To access this post, you must purchase VIP Annual Membership, 1 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or 3 Month Membership.

Harley Robert Williamson

In Williamson v Hodgson [2010] WASC 95 1 the appellant was charged for speeding and found guilty. He had numerous grounds of appeal, starting with the premise that section 45 of the Criminal Code (WA) affords him some defence to the speeding charge, that the magistrate erred in law by refusing his request for a trial by … Continue reading Harley Robert Williamson →Share this:TweetMoreShare on TumblrWhatsAppEmailPocketTelegramLike this:Like Loading...
To access this post, you must purchase VIP Annual Membership, 1 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or 3 Month Membership.

Tadeusz Krysiak

Tadeusz Krysiak was charged with exceeding the speed limit. At the mention and trial he sought to challenge the jurisdiction of the Magistrates Court but was unsuccessful, and sought leave to appeal the conviction in Krysiak v Hodgson, [2009] WASC 16 1 but did not appear. The court found the grounds on the submissions were … Continue reading Tadeusz Krysiak →Share this:TweetMoreShare on TumblrWhatsAppEmailPocketTelegramLike this:Like Loading...
To access this post, you must purchase VIP Annual Membership, 1 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or 3 Month Membership.

Anderson v Kerslake [2013] QDC 262

The appellant was convicted for failure to vote at an election without a valid and sufficient excuse. In Anderson v Kerslake [2013] QDC 262 Nerissa Anderson appealed the decision as "Nerissa of the Ngadjon-Jii Tribe" arguing she did not make a plea, that her birth certificate documentation was altered, that she is not an Australian … Continue reading Anderson v Kerslake [2013] QDC 262 →Share this:TweetMoreShare on TumblrWhatsAppEmailPocketTelegramLike this:Like Loading...
To access this post, you must purchase VIP Annual Membership, 1 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or 3 Month Membership.

National Australia Bank v Walter [2004] VSC 36; 1 BFRA 509

In National Australia Bank v Walter [2004] VSC 36; 1 BFRA 509 the applicants raised a number of unorthodox arguments, including entitlement to trial by jury under Magna Carta, contended that the Constitution Act 1975 (Vic) is invalid on the ground that there is no proof that Queen Elizabeth II gave it royal assent, and … Continue reading National Australia Bank v Walter [2004] VSC 36; 1 BFRA 509 →Share this:TweetMoreShare on TumblrWhatsAppEmailPocketTelegramLike this:Like Loading...
To access this post, you must purchase VIP Annual Membership, 1 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or 3 Month Membership.

Harding v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (No 2) [2008] FCA 1985

Robert Harding was a member of UPMART that bought a “GST Exemption Kit” from Malcolm McClure for $2000, only to find out it was a useless scam. He appealed the District Court decision in Harding v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (No 2) [2008] FCA 1985  on the basis he had received misleading advice from Malcolm … Continue reading Harding v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (No 2) [2008] FCA 1985 →Share this:TweetMoreShare on TumblrWhatsAppEmailPocketTelegramLike this:Like Loading...
To access this post, you must purchase VIP Annual Membership, 1 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or 3 Month Membership.

The Corica’s

With a litigation history that rivals that of vexatious litigant Wayne Glew, the Corica's have been involved in at least 17 failed cases in which various flawed contentions were submitted. Although many of the following matters ran concurrently and on the same subject, I have divided them into their particular series as: (1) Corica v … Continue reading The Corica’s →Share this:TweetMoreShare on TumblrWhatsAppEmailPocketTelegramLike this:Like Loading...
To access this post, you must purchase VIP Annual Membership, 1 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or 3 Month Membership.

Smart v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2002] VSCA 111

In Smart v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2002] VSCA 111 the appellant resisted a mortgage foreclosure, firstly insisting on a right to trial by jury under the Magna Carta, and further contending that no moneys were lent, but only credit created by book entry, which was unlawful because the only lawful mode … Continue reading Smart v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2002] VSCA 111 →Share this:TweetMoreShare on TumblrWhatsAppEmailPocketTelegramLike this:Like Loading...
To access this post, you must purchase VIP Annual Membership, 1 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or 3 Month Membership.

Flowers v State of New South Wales [2020] NSWSC 526

In Flowers v State of New South Wales [2020] NSWSC 526 the applicant sought to order that his claim for damages for malicious prosecution be heard by a jury, and that his application for a jury should itself be determined by a jury. In a very impressive document headed “Challenge to the Jurisdiction of the … Continue reading Flowers v State of New South Wales [2020] NSWSC 526 → Share this:TweetMoreShare on TumblrWhatsAppEmailPocketTelegramLike this:Like Loading...
To access this post, you must purchase VIP Annual Membership, 1 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or 3 Month Membership.

Mike Palmer

Mike Palmer operates Know Your Rights Group and Aussie Speeding Fines, both websites promote many OPCA concepts and sells booklets of the same titles. Despite Mike Palmer failing in his own cases submitting the very contentions he promotes, he continues to sell his flawed ideas to other gullible people for financial gain. Mike Palmer's Facebook page … Continue reading Mike Palmer →Share this:TweetMoreShare on TumblrWhatsAppEmailPocketTelegramLike this:Like Loading...
To access this post, you must purchase VIP Annual Membership, 1 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or 3 Month Membership.

Szita v Capital Finance Australia Limited (2004) FCA 477

Szita v Capital Finance Australia Limited (2004) FCA 477 The appellant claimed that by sending to Capital a document call a “certified promissory note” specifying an amount of $116,375.95, Mr Szita has discharged any liability to Capital. The Court concluded that Mr Szita’s claim is manifestly hopeless, wholly untenable, incapable of constituting tender of payment, … Continue reading Szita v Capital Finance Australia Limited (2004) FCA 477 → Share this:TweetMoreShare on TumblrWhatsAppEmailPocketTelegramLike this:Like Loading...
To access this post, you must purchase VIP Annual Membership, 1 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or 3 Month Membership.

Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Bonaccorso (No 1 2 & 3) [2016] NSWSC 595/766/1018

The defendant challenges the Deputy Commissioner’s standing, and the existence of the legislative scheme under which the proceedings are pursued; the Court’s jurisdiction and indeed, its existence; the very existence of Australia as a nation; the existence of the Constitution as a law under which the Federal Parliament enacts statutes, and whether certain statutes have … Continue reading Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Bonaccorso (No 1 2 & 3) [2016] NSWSC 595/766/1018 → Share this:TweetMoreShare on TumblrWhatsAppEmailPocketTelegramLike this:Like Loading...
To access this post, you must purchase VIP Annual Membership, 1 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or 3 Month Membership.

John Peter Bauskis

In the matter of Bauskis [2006] NSWSC 908 John Peter Bauskis was convicted with contempt of court over an incident where a group of protesters for John Wilson caused havoc at one of his hearings, yelling abuse at the judge for refusing to grant a trial by jury in a summary offence matter. The judge … Continue reading John Peter Bauskis → Share this:TweetMoreShare on TumblrWhatsAppEmailPocketTelegramLike this:Like Loading...
To access this post, you must purchase VIP Annual Membership, 1 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or 3 Month Membership.

Warren Ronald Wichman v Pepper Finance Corporation Limited [2019] NSWCA 195

The issues raised before the Registrar and in Pepper Finance Corporation Limited v Wichman [2019] NSWSC 1009 relate, amongst other things, to what Mr Warren Ronald Wichman refers to as "common law rights" and the requirement to be sworn to the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901 (UK). The applicant disputes the jurisdiction of the … Continue reading Warren Ronald Wichman v Pepper Finance Corporation Limited [2019] NSWCA 195 → Share this:TweetMoreShare on TumblrWhatsAppEmailPocketTelegramLike this:Like Loading...
To access this post, you must purchase VIP Annual Membership, 1 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or 3 Month Membership.

Best v Police [2015] SASC 190

Best v Police [2015] SASC 190 The appellant contended that the trial should not have proceeded ex-parte, that the Magistrates Court is not a court of competent jurisdiction; the device used to measure his speed did not meet the National Measurement Act 1960 (Cth) and the certificates of accuracy were invalid and the method of testing it by the … Continue reading Best v Police [2015] SASC 190 → Share this:TweetMoreShare on TumblrWhatsAppEmailPocketTelegramLike this:Like Loading...
To access this post, you must purchase VIP Annual Membership, 1 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or 3 Month Membership.

Peter Gargan

Vexatious litigant Peter Alexander Gargan is still very active in the OPCA community, advising Rod Culleton in his matters before the courts, as well as recently travelling to the UK on his behalf attempting to bring a case before the Privy Council. In Official Trustee in Bankruptcy v Gargan (No 2) [2009] FCA 398  Mr Con … Continue reading Peter Gargan →Share this:TweetMoreShare on TumblrWhatsAppEmailPocketTelegramLike this:Like Loading...
To access this post, you must purchase VIP Annual Membership, 1 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or 3 Month Membership.

Burns v The State of Western Australia [2017] WASC 173

In Burns v The State of Western Australia [2017] WASC 173 the appellant complained about the jurisdiction of the courts to deal with his property. He contends that Landgate is a subsidiary of the corporation State of Western Australia, which is a subsidiary of the Commonwealth of Australia, which is a trading company registered on the … Continue reading Burns v The State of Western Australia [2017] WASC 173 →Share this:TweetMoreShare on TumblrWhatsAppEmailPocketTelegramLike this:Like Loading...
To access this post, you must purchase VIP Annual Membership, 1 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or 3 Month Membership.

Pham v Secretary, Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations [2009] FCA 1310

In Pham v Secretary, Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations [2009] FCA 1310 the appellant contended that the Governor General was not validity appointed, and thus the judges appointment was not valid. The Court held that the Governor-General was appointed to his office in accordance with the current Letters Patent (as amended on 11 May … Continue reading Pham v Secretary, Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations [2009] FCA 1310 → Share this:TweetMoreShare on TumblrWhatsAppEmailPocketTelegramLike this:Like Loading...
To access this post, you must purchase VIP Annual Membership, 1 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or 3 Month Membership.

Hubner v Erbacher [2004] QDC 345

In Hubner v Erbacher [2004] QDC 345 the appellant had homemade number plates attached to his vehicle as if it were a number plate issued pursuant to the regulation. He directed his arguments towards demonstrating that either the relevant regulation was not a valid law or that other legal rights, which he claimed to have, prevailed … Continue reading Hubner v Erbacher [2004] QDC 345 → Share this:TweetMoreShare on TumblrWhatsAppEmailPocketTelegramLike this:Like Loading...
To access this post, you must purchase VIP Annual Membership, 1 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or 3 Month Membership.

The Myth of Jury Nullification

R v Abbott [2006] VSCA 100 "The applicant’s concept of nullification is also said to entitle a jury to return a verdict of not guilty notwithstanding that they are satisfied that a breach of the law has been committed if the jury thinks the law unjust. The applicant contends that the trial judge in the … Continue reading The Myth of Jury Nullification → Share this:TweetMoreShare on TumblrWhatsAppEmailPocketTelegramLike this:Like Loading...
To access this post, you must purchase VIP Annual Membership, 1 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or 3 Month Membership.

Trial by Jury

Section 80 of the Commonwealth Constitution It is a common belief among OPCA theorists that the judiciary is denying a defendant his rights under chapter 29 of the Magna Carta by not allowing him "the judgment of his peers" implying that a trial by jury 1 must be conducted for every matter before the court, including … Continue reading Trial by Jury → Share this:TweetMoreShare on TumblrWhatsAppEmailPocketTelegramLike this:Like Loading...
To access this post, you must purchase VIP Annual Membership, 1 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or 3 Month Membership.

Rodney Culleton

Even a few Australian members of parliament have fallen for OPCA theories... Anne Bressington, who was elected to the South Australian Legislative Council at the 2006 South Australian election as Nick Xenophon's running mate, was once reported to have followed One Peoples Public Trust, and was later involved with UN Swissindo, another OPCA scam. Malcolm … Continue reading Rodney Culleton → Share this:TweetMoreShare on TumblrWhatsAppEmailPocketTelegramLike this:Like Loading...
To access this post, you must purchase VIP Annual Membership, 1 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or 3 Month Membership.

Nibbs v Devonport City Council [2015] TASSC 34

Michael Nibbs contended so many different very common Australian pseudo legal themes in this case it is among my favourites, but I suppose the main point is the objection raised regarding judicial oath of office. Before the Promissory Oaths Act 2015, Magistrates and Justices were required to take and subscribe the judicial oath prescribed by the … Continue reading Nibbs v Devonport City Council [2015] TASSC 34 → Share this:TweetMoreShare on TumblrWhatsAppEmailPocketTelegramLike this:Like Loading...
To access this post, you must purchase VIP Annual Membership, 1 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or 3 Month Membership.

Wayne Glew

Wayne Kenneth Glew 1 has an extensive OPCA and constitutional litigation history.  In fact, the decisions made in Wayne's cases are relied upon, whenever similar contentions are brought before courts today, and in many cases they have become precedent in the particular point of law. Here is a brief summary of cases past:  Glew & … Continue reading Wayne Glew →Share this:TweetMoreShare on TumblrWhatsAppEmailPocketTelegramLike this:Like Loading...
To access this post, you must purchase VIP Annual Membership, 1 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or 3 Month Membership.

John Wilson

73-year-old John Wilson 1 does not look like your stereotypical terrorist. Hunched and with the remains of his white hair flying from the sides of his head, the former dentist is a regular fixture outside NSW courts. Spouting his hyperbole about being a Sovereign Citizen, he appears to be a harmless eccentric. But to NSW … Continue reading John Wilson → Share this:TweetMoreShare on TumblrWhatsAppEmailPocketTelegramLike this:Like Loading...
To access this post, you must purchase VIP Annual Membership, 1 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or 3 Month Membership.

Mark McMurtrie

The Original Sovereign Tribal Federation 1 was created by Mark McMurtrie 2 https://freemandelusion.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/ostf-declaration-of-sovereignty-and-nationhood-original-sovereign-tribal-federation.pdf A burgeoning faction of Freemen are targeting Indigenous audiences in Australia 3 A taste of the subculture can be gleaned online, in groups such as the Tribal Sovereign Parliament of Gondwana Land, the Original Sovereign Tribal Federation (OSTF) and the Original Sovereign Confederation. The … Continue reading Mark McMurtrie → Share this:TweetMoreShare on TumblrWhatsAppEmailPocketTelegramLike this:Like Loading...
To access this post, you must purchase VIP Annual Membership, 1 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or 3 Month Membership.