To prevent the spread of various pseudo legal myths, this website relies on public support to continue this vital work. Please choose one of the following membership options to view the complete content of this article: 1 Month Membership, 3 Month Membership, 6 Month Membership or VIP Annual Membership. If you are already a member, Log in here to be redirected back to this page.
National Australia Bank v Walter [2004] VSC 36; 1 BFRA 509
In National Australia Bank v Walter [2004] VSC 36; 1 BFRA 509 the applicants raised a number of unorthodox arguments, including entitlement to trial by jury under Magna Carta, contended that the Constitution Act 1975 (Vic) is invalid on the … Continue reading National Australia Bank v Walter [2004] VSC 36; 1 BFRA 509