Kosteska v Magistrate Manthey & Anor [2013] QCA 105

Kosteska v Phillips; Kosteska v Commissioner of Police [2011] QCA 266 The applicant contended that the Court of Appeal was not a lawfully established court and raised a complaint that the only form of legal tender was gold or silver … Continue reading Kosteska v Magistrate Manthey & Anor [2013] QCA 105 →

To access the encyclopedia content, please renew your Website Access. If you are already a member, Log in here to be redirected back to this page. Alternatively, documents are available on the homepage.

Woods v Australian Taxation Office & Ors [2016] QDC 198

The Australian Taxation Office submitted that Sonia Woods had tax liabilities owing of $77,521.21. In her correspondence with the Australian Taxation Office from August 2015, she raised various issues concerning her debt including the alleged operation of the Bills of … Continue reading Woods v Australian Taxation Office & Ors [2016] QDC 198 →

Burns v The State of Western Australia [2017] WASC 173

In Burns v The State of Western Australia [2017] WASC 173 the appellant complained about the jurisdiction of the courts to deal with his property. He contends that Landgate is a subsidiary of the corporation State of Western Australia, which is … Continue reading Burns v The State of Western Australia [2017] WASC 173 →

Palmer v City of Gosnells [2014] WASCA 102

In Palmer v City of Gosnells [2014] WASCA 102 the appellants contended that the Oath of Allegiance in the schedule to the Commonwealth Constitution must be sworn by every government officer State and Commonwealth, the Magistrates Court Act 2004 (WA) is … Continue reading Palmer v City of Gosnells [2014] WASCA 102 →

R v Stoneman [2013] QCA 209

In R v Stoneman [2013] QCA 209 the applicant contended judicial bias for not upholding “an unalienable right of the private individual to use the common ways to travel as per the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” … Continue reading R v Stoneman [2013] QCA 209 →

A Corporation can be a Person, but a Person cannot be a Corporation

OPCA theorists contend that a “natural person” is a unregistered “living man” whereas a birth certificate creates a juristic, artificial or fictitious person, or “corporation”. Legal persons (Latin. persona juris) are of TWO kinds: (1) NATURAL PERSON (an individual person, … Continue reading A Corporation can be a Person, but a Person cannot be a Corporation →

Everything is a contract

“If man were to live in a state of nature, unconnected with other individuals, there would be no occasion for any other laws, than the law of nature, and the law of God. Neither could any other law possibly exist: … Continue reading Everything is a contract →

Christopher James David Summers

“Has the Queen enacted it?” An extremely patient Queensland police officer has been praised online for his tact, when dealing with a man who insisted he could not legally be breathalysed until he was shown a proclamation certificate signed by the … Continue reading Christopher James David Summers →

Ivan Bortic

The Courier Mail: “Man refuses breath test, seeks compo in ’24 carat gold’”: The Courier Mail: “Man who refused breath test, sought compo in gold faces court”: Ivan Bortic refused a breathalyser, was arrested, demanded compo in gold… and walked! … Continue reading Ivan Bortic →

Steven Spiers

Steven Spiers is an OPCA litigant now residing in North Queensland, after living in both New South Wales and Victoria, but is originally from the Northern Territory. His Facebook profile Steven Spiers has been discontinued, however his YouTube account is still … Continue reading Steven Spiers →

Romley Stewart Stover

Romley Stewart Stover is an OPCA adherent from Far North Queensland. He is the author of “The Justinian Deception” and also runs the Justinian Deception website, and invents various other associated pseudo legal myths. He doesn’t recognise his surname as … Continue reading Romley Stewart Stover →

Sam Jones

Sam Jones operates the Corporate Australia website. There are countless articles on his website relating to the “strawman” and “common law” myths, with an added twist of the “corporate government” myth to incite an emotional response from the reader, to “fire them … Continue reading Sam Jones →

McDougall v City of Playford [2017] SASC 169

In McDougall v City of Playford [2017] SASC 169 the appellant was appealing a conviction for a parking fine. “This contention, as are all of the appellant’s various constitutional contentions, is incoherent and nonsensical. Indeed, the appellant’s contentions are so wide … Continue reading McDougall v City of Playford [2017] SASC 169 →

The Brigalow Corporation Myth

The conspiracy theory that the Brigalow Corporation had taken over all the land in Queensland originated in the material of David Walter and Sue Maynes. The Brigalow Lands Development Scheme in Queensland began in 1962 and involved the clearing and development of … Continue reading The Brigalow Corporation Myth →

The Uniform Commercial Code

OPCA theorists often insist that the UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE is some sort of “international law” that applies to every nation, but this is completely false. The U.C.C. operates mainly in the U.S. where it is used to harmonise the law … Continue reading The Uniform Commercial Code →

Van den Hoorn v Ellis [2010] QDC 451

In Van den Hoorn v Ellis [2010] QDC 451 the appellant contended he was the “owner of the created fictions known as JOHAN HENDRICK VAN DEN HOORN and JOHN HENRY VAN DEN HOORN, being created fictions fraudulently owned and controlled by … Continue reading Van den Hoorn v Ellis [2010] QDC 451 →

Wayne Glew

Wayne Kenneth Glew has an extensive OPCA and constitutional litigation history. In fact, the decisions made in Wayne’s cases are relied upon, whenever similar contentions are brought before courts today, and in many cases they have become precedent in the particular … Continue reading Wayne Glew →

Mark McMurtrie

A burgeoning faction of Freemen have been targeting Indigenous audiences in Australia. A taste of the subculture can be gleaned online, in groups such as the Tribal Sovereign Parliament of Gondwana Land, the Original Sovereign Tribal Federation (OSTF) and the Original … Continue reading Mark McMurtrie →

Early OPCA Influence in Australia

Throughout the 2000s, OPCA concepts became increasingly cross-contaminated. Foreign concepts and legislation, such as A4V and the Uniform Commercial Code became common features in OPCA legal proceedings in the Commonwealth, sometimes alone and sometimes in combination with domestic concepts. This … Continue reading Early OPCA Influence in Australia →

One Peoples Public Trust – Heather Anne Tucci Jarraf

The One Peoples Public Trust was started by Heather Anne Tucci Jarraf. She initially filed a record with the U.C.C. (Uniform Commercial Code) and consistent with OPCA theory, after the filing was not “rebutted” by the “due date” it went … Continue reading One Peoples Public Trust – Heather Anne Tucci Jarraf →

Councils are unconstitutional!

The premise that rates are unconstitutional because local government is not recognised in the Commonwealth Constitution is a false one, and many have lost their homes attempting this. The main problem with this argument is the fact that we are … Continue reading Councils are unconstitutional! →

Where’s the Commonwealth of Australia?

A popular OPCA concept in Australia is the theory that because the government publications often have the title “The Australian Government” this verifies the original “Government of the Commonwealth of Australia” has been usurped, and is now under foreign administration. Wherever … Continue reading Where’s the Commonwealth of Australia? →

Danny Maksacheff

Danny Maksacheff is an OPCA litigant in New South Wales, who was influenced by a number of people such as Glenn Bowley, Romley Stewart Stover and Rodney Culleton, to pursue the course of action against the bank. Among the various OPCA … Continue reading Danny Maksacheff →

Brian Shaw

Brian Shaw argues with a non-existent court One of my favourite passages from Brian Shaw’s cases, that really highlights the paradox and internal inconsistency that OPCA litigants in general create for themselves, was stated by Maxwell P in Shaw v … Continue reading Brian Shaw →

Ross Bradley

I’d had quite a few conversations with Ross Bradley over the years, and explained exactly why each of his legal theories are unworkable. He didn’t listen of course, and went on to waste a lot of time in the courts just … Continue reading Ross Bradley →

Australia is NOT a foreign corporation registered with the U.S. S.E.C.

OPCA theorists in Australia often claim that our original government was hijacked, and the entity is now just a “corporation posing as a government” and hold as evidence of this fallacy, our registration details in the United States Security Exchange … Continue reading Australia is NOT a foreign corporation registered with the U.S. S.E.C. →